Skip to main content
RelixQBEYOND QUANTUM
Menu
Course outline

Deciding

The exposure window and Mosca's inequality

How to combine confidentiality lifetime and migration time into an exposure window, using Mosca's inequality as a planning heuristic, not a measurement.

6 min read · 6 min 21 sec film

What you'll be able to do

  • State Mosca's inequality and what each variable (X, Y, Z) represents.
  • Explain why Z cannot be measured and why the inequality is a heuristic, not a prediction.
  • Compute whether a scenario is already late, given X, Y, and Z.

Lesson film

Watch: The exposure window and Mosca's inequality

Two of the three terms are estimable and one never will be — which turns out to be fine, because the comparison between flows does the work.

6 min 21 sec · 8 scenes

6 min 21 sec, narrated by your browser's voice. Captions and a full transcript are below — nothing here needs sound.

The four variables answer whether a specific piece of data is exposed at all.

0:006:21

With the player focused: Space plays or pauses, ← → seek ten seconds, Home restarts, M toggles narration.

Full transcript

1. From exposure to urgency

2. The three terms

3. Four steps

4. What a verdict looks like

5. Heuristic, not measurement

6. Comparing flows

7. X and Y do the work

8. Takeaway

The written lesson

The four variables from Module 2 answer whether a specific piece of data is exposed at all. This lesson adds the timing question: given that exposure, how urgently does it need to be fixed? Michele Mosca's formulation gives a simple way to reason about that: act now if X + Y > Z.

X
Required secrecy lifetime — the confidentiality lifetime from Module 2, measured forward from today.
Y
Migration time — how long it will actually take to identify, replace, and verify the protecting cryptography for this data flow.
Z
Time until a cryptographically relevant quantum computer exists — unknown, and not something this course, or anyone, can measure.
  1. 01

    Estimate X

    Take the confidentiality lifetime established in Module 2, measured from today, not from when the data was created.

  2. 02

    Estimate Y

    Ask the team that would actually do the migration how long discovery, replacement, and verification would take for this specific flow — not a generic program estimate.

  3. 03

    Treat Z as unknown

    No credible source can state a date for a cryptographically relevant quantum computer. Use Z as a labeled, contested planning input, never as a fact plugged into a spreadsheet.

  4. 04

    Compare, and date the verdict

    Compare X + Y to explicitly hypothetical values or ranges for Z, and explain when the conclusion changes. Record the date, capture path, and confidence behind X and Y. The inequality helps decide what to investigate and migrate; it does not establish a measured deadline.

X and Y are variables an organization can investigate and sometimes shorten; Z remains uncertain. Long confidentiality lifetimes and slow migration paths can increase urgency under a range of plausible Z scenarios. A decision should also state whether the data and relevant key artifacts are actually capturable and what impact their disclosure would have.

Hypothetical inputYears from nowInterpretation
Existing record secrecy ends5A record captured today may no longer be sensitive at year 10
Classical flow migration finishes8New records may continue to be captured until then
Assumed capable machine appears10A record captured in year 8 with five-year secrecy can still matter
Illustration only: X = 5, Y = 8, Z = 10. The inequality holds even though the record captured today expires before Z.

The inequality compares a period of continued exposure and the protection lifetime of information introduced during that period. It does not prove that today’s record was captured, or supply a probability for a quantum computer. Compare several explicitly hypothetical Z values and migration estimates; identify which conclusions survive the uncertainty.

Primary reading and claim sources

Publication status checked on the date shown. Draft guidance can change.

Knowledge check

A data class must remain confidential for 12 more years (X). The team estimates migration of its protecting cryptography would take 3 years once started (Y). No one can state a credible value for Z, the time until a cryptographically relevant quantum computer exists.

What is the defensible conclusion under Mosca's inequality?

Marking a lesson complete only updates this browser.